Docento.app
Notebook, coffee, and laptop on a desk
All Posts

Concise Writing: How to Say the Same Thing in Half the Words

By The Docento.app TeamPublished Updated 5 min read
Try Docento's free PDF editorNo sign-up, 100% private — sign, annotate, and stamp PDFs in your browser.Open the editor

Long writing isn't more thorough — it's less read. Every unnecessary word is a small tax on the reader, and the taxes compound: a 400-word email gets skimmed where a 150-word version gets read. Concision is not about sounding clipped. It's about making every word pull weight.

Where the extra words hide

Wordiness is remarkably predictable. The same patterns pad nearly all business writing:

  • Throat-clearing openers. "I just wanted to reach out because I was thinking that..." → delete entirely. Start at the content.
  • Phrase-for-word swaps. "In order to" → "to." "At this point in time" → "now." "Due to the fact that" → "because." "In the event that" → "if."
  • Double-dipping. "Absolutely essential," "past history," "end result," "collaborate together" — each pair contains a free deletion.
  • Nominalizations. Verbs disguised as nouns: "make a decision" → "decide," "conduct an analysis" → "analyze," "reach an agreement" → "agree."
  • Preemptive apologies and hedges. "Sorry if this is a dumb question, but maybe..." — the question is fine; ask it.

Passive voice, used carelessly

"A decision was made to postpone the launch" is longer than "we postponed the launch" and hides the thing a reader most wants to know: who did it. That concealment is often why the passive was chosen, consciously or not — it's the grammar of avoiding responsibility.

The rule isn't "never use the passive." It's right when the actor is genuinely unknown, genuinely irrelevant, or when the object is the real subject of the sentence. "The server was compromised at 3am" is fine. "Mistakes were made" is not, and everybody can hear it.

The 50% pass

A blunt exercise that works: take a finished draft and cut it to half its word count. Not "trim" — half. You'll fight for every sentence, and that fight reveals which sentences were doing work and which were decoration. You won't always ship the 50% version, but it recalibrates your sense of what's essential. Most people who do this exercise a few times find their first drafts shrink permanently.

Cut structure, not just words

Word-level editing has a ceiling. Past a point, the remaining bloat isn't in the phrasing — it's in saying things that don't need saying at all.

Look for whole paragraphs that restate a previous paragraph in different words, background the reader already has, justification nobody asked for, and the very common pattern of explaining your reasoning process when the reader only needs your conclusion. Deleting one unnecessary paragraph beats tightening ten sentences, and it's the edit people avoid because the paragraph is good — well-written and irrelevant.

The sharpest test: for each paragraph, ask what breaks if it's gone. If nothing does, it's gone.

Concision is a reader-count multiplier

The economics matter most when many people read the same text. A meandering paragraph in a company-wide email wastes a minute times a thousand readers. This is why executive communication is so compressed — and why "make it shorter" is the most common editing note in senior reviews. If you're compressing a rough draft under time pressure, a dedicated rewriting tool handles the mechanical layer well: it produces the tightened version with a word-level diff, so you can see exactly which padding got cut and veto anything that changed meaning rather than length.

What not to cut

Concision has casualties when it's applied blindly:

  • Context for decisions. "Do X by Friday" without why invites pushback; one sentence of reason is cheap insurance.
  • Courtesy. "Thanks" and "please" survive every good edit. Cutting warmth to save four words is a bad trade.
  • Precision. "Soon" is shorter than "by Thursday noon" and infinitely worse.
  • Necessary hedging. "This will increase conversion" and "this should increase conversion, based on one test" are different claims. Removing the qualifier doesn't tighten the sentence; it changes what you're asserting, and makes you wrong more often.

The goal is density, not brevity: maximum meaning per word, not minimum words.

Short sentences are the cheat code

If you apply only one technique: shorten sentences. Long sentences hide weak logic, ambiguous references, and buried verbs; splitting them exposes all three. Aim for an average around 15–20 words, with deliberate variety. A short sentence after two long ones lands hard. Use that.

Write long, then cut

The advice most likely to actually change your output: stop trying to be concise in the first draft.

Concision is an editing skill, not a drafting one. Attempting both simultaneously is what produces the paralysed writer rewriting sentence one for twenty minutes. Get the thinking down badly and at speed, then cut hard on a second pass — ideally after a break, because your own padding is close to invisible while the sentences are still warm.

This is also why concision is largely a time problem rather than a talent problem. As Pascal wrote, roughly: this letter is long because I did not have time to make it shorter. Almost every bloated document at work is a first draft that shipped.

Try Docento's free PDF editor

No sign-up, 100% private — sign, annotate, and stamp PDFs in your browser.

Open the editor

Related Posts